The Copper Archipelago: InterCloud

Editors note: In addition to several minor copy edits to correct spelling and grammar usage, the article was amended to include a comment from John Mylant denying that he is part of an organized stock promotion effort. A disputed December 2011 transaction between Orlando Birbragher and the stock promoter Richard Barsom was mischaracterized and was changed to reflect the claims in a lawsuit.

It’s fair to say that a recent New York Observer article ably framed what every investor needs to know about a curious enterprise named InterCloud Systems: its prospects are marginal and the management doubly so. Experience, however, often shows that companies surfacing from the bronze deep of small-capitalization stock finance have rich backstories.

With that in mind, the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation dove in, tracing the backgrounds of its executives, advisors and following the money trails between the two.

An examination of InterCloud’s filings did not disappoint, revealing a company that Oliver Stone might love, a rich corporate vein of collapsed ventures and peopled with the alpha promoters of the penny stock world, whose conflicts of interest and links to the graveyards of investor capital are legion.

-------------------

InterCloud wants you to see it as a “cloud computing” vendor, selling software platforms and services by way of the internet, in the fashion of a Rackspace or Amazon.

What it does for money, as the Observer reported however, is more broadly understood as “cable installation.” Putting in cable is a legitimate business, but it is not one that day traders and momentum investors--the two sorts of investors most likely to own InterCloud at this point in its history--are likely to bid up the share price to own.

So InterCloud is a good example of an important corporate marketing maxim: words matter. “Cloud computing” or even “carrier network expansion” sound better than “a series of servers” or “cable installation.” (In turn, both of those sound better than the truly accurate descriptor: “A company’s fifth attempt at developing a business model in under 15 years.”

InterCloud’s lineage traces to the industry of Michael D. Farkas, a broker in the boiler rooms of New York and Miami in the early and mid-1990s who managed to evolve up that food chain into founding and running companies that inevitably became heavily promoted penny stocks. In 1999, in conjunction with his former secretary Jamee Freeman, he spun a pair of reverse mergers, I-RealtyAuction.com and Sky Way Communications, out of a late Dot Com era construct he launched called I-Incubator.com. For three years I-RealtyAuction.com went nowhere until 2001 when Farkas struck a deal with veteran real estate developers Darren and Jeffrey Glick, renaming the company Genesis Realty and promptly resigning. The rebranding didn’t work though and the company lay dormant until 2009.

(Sky Way Communications, those with longer memories may recall, got some attention when an aircraft it leased was seized in Mexico in 2006 with over five tons of cocaine on board. In 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued two of Farkas’ colleagues in Sky Way with misleading investors. Farkas, the company’s biggest investor, was not charged in either episode. He is now the chief executive of an electric car charging station vendor.)

In 2009 Gideon Taylor, the former CEO of Able Telecom, a lower-tier fiber installation company whose pronouncements of looming success did not translate into a sustainable business, took over Genesis Realty and began a series of acquisitions within the cable installation field.

To get some capital Taylor first went to Udi Toledano, who runs a series of portfolios that act as a form of small-cap private equity fund and who wound up managing some of the then frozen assets of controversial hedge fund manager Michael Lauer. (Charged with wire fraud and conspiracy violations by Federal prosecutors in 2008, Lauer was acquitted after a jury trial in 2011.) In 2010, Taylor cut a deal with Orlando Birbragher, who had just emerged from serving a 35 month prison sentence for running Pharmacom, an online drugstore whose business model was to sell anyone willing to pay its high-prices for prescription medications, drawing the wrath of the Department of Justice.

The mention of the Birbragher deal in InterClouds filings is sterile enough: in February 2011, in exchange for some unspecified consulting services, Birbragher was paid $240,000 in shares in InterCloud predecessor Genesis Group.

Additional digging reveals a clearer sense of Birbragher's background, which seems to have been ripped from the pages of both Carl Hiaasen and Robert Ludlum in equal measure.

According to Drug Enforcement Agency Special Agent Gary Coffman (who gave detailed testimony about Birbragher’s undisclosed history as part of a pretrial motion Federal prosecutors submitted in December 2007), Orlando Birbragher was a drug smuggler for a group allied with a senior general in the Panamanian Defense Forces in the 1980s and early 1990s. Moreover, Birbragher and his father, according to DEA special agent Coffman, also ran a busy weapons smuggling network whose customer was M-19, the Colombian guerilla movement.

Birbragher was a particularly talented money launderer, according to the DEA’s special agent Coffman, and even after his days of shipping cocaine from Panama to Florida were over, he faithfully moved millions of purportedly ill-gotten dollars for Colombian drug traffickers. His efforts in moving cash for these groups through a series of banks--including the one where his then girlfriend (now his wife) Alexis was employed--breached an immunity agreement Birbragher struck in 1991 with Federal prosecutors, and led to his 1994 arrest in Aspen for money laundering charges. (The DEA special agent said Birbragher managed to cut a second immunity deal in exchange for his cooperation.)

This is not the first Birbragher to garner attention for money laundering in South Florida.

In 1981 a Fernando Birbragher was charged for laundering money for Colombian drug group, but it is unclear if he is related to Orlando and he appears not to have been convicted. A call and email to Orlando Birbragher seeking comment were not returned; Fernando Birbragher, who has been involved in a series of small-cap stock ventures, as well as the South Florida aviation business, could not be reached.

Even within the often woolly realm of small cap equity finance, where civil and regulatory headaches are happily dismissed or buried, a transaction with the likes of an Orlando Birbragher is not an everyday development.

So the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation reached out to the company for a response. InterCloud’s contact for press inquiries is a man named Lawrence Sands, who per the Observer, is an unusual choice to serve in the role of a senior vice president and board secretary of a publicly traded company.

Why is Sands an odd choice? To start with, he resigned as a lawyer in New York State in June 2000 in front of a full-bore State Bar review for misconduct involving a client’s escrow account. Sands also served a stint as the chief executive of Paivis Corp., a penny stock that tried to sell prepaid phone cards and which sought (unsuccessfully) to merge with TrustCash, an online money transfer service. (In September the U.S. Attorney’s office in Newark sued a unit of TrustCash for illegal money transmittal activities.)

Sands told the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation that there had been no “transaction with Birbragher” who had “only helped the previous management” with some “consulting related to introductions to banks.” To that end, “No one [at InterCloud] has ever had anything to do with [Birbragher] since then, we’ve totally divorced ourselves from that relationship.” (It bears noting that Sands was also part of the previous management team, and the current CEO, Mark Munro, was one of the company’s biggest investors.)

Shortly after the call, the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation found a January 2012 lawsuit on PACER filed by Birbragher against Richard Barsom, a New York-based stock promoter. The gist of the suit is that Barsom purportedly failed to deliver a $75, 000 payment for 50,000 shares of Blue Sky Holdings, a then client of Barsom’s company, to Birbragher. Birbragher’s signatory on the collapsed deal was Lawrence Sands, according to the suit. (The suit was dismissed in June of 2012 when the court ruled that Barsom had never been served. Reached at his residence, Barsom declined comment about the case and his dealings with Birbragher and Sands, saying only, “I can’t stand thinking about those two fucking clowns.”)

So the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation called Sands again.

“Look,” said Sands when confronted with evidence of his professional relationship with Birbragher despite his assurances of several minutes prior, “I was doing some work for [Birbragher] in 2012 because he had a connection in California and it looked like we were going to do some deals and he needed some advice. I promise that I stopped working with him after about three months.”

In response to questions about what prompted the relationship to stop, Sands was emphatic, “[Birbragher] stiffed me; he just never paid me. I thought he had money but he didn’t. I can’t deal with liars, integrity is everything to me.” Despite a series of questions about Birbragher, drug smuggling and money laundering, Sands described that period in InterCloud’s history as, “Being really rough to get [a deal] going. You have to remember, our stock price was really low then and people didn’t like dealing with Gideon Taylor. Mark Munro has made things much easier.”

Unsurprisingly, the Sands-Birbragher axis had one more angle left to explore and in a follow-up call, the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation asked Sands about a pair of businesses registered on the same day in January 2012, Card Technology Service LLC and Card Technology Inc. Seemingly identical, the LLC listed Birbragher as an officer but expired in October 2012 and is classified as “inactive”; the corporation listed “Larry Sands” at the address of the InterCloud office in Boca Raton. Moreover, both businesses appear to be connected to credit card processing, the same business that Blue Sky Holdings was in.

After initially denying that he had ever heard of these people or businesses, Sands suggested that since “I try to help so many people because I am a lawyer, maybe I signed something and can’t remember when [or for whom.]” After several minutes Sands also recalled the name of one of the other officers but he took great pains to note that signing a document “Larry” is not something he would ever do because, “It is inappropriate to use a nickname in business dealings.”

------------------------------------

The balance of InterCloud’s filings are also revealing.

Consider that its auditor was Sherb & Co. LLP, a firm the Securities and Exchange Commission sued last year for failure to properly supervise and make necessary disclosures about the audits of three China-based client, resulting in a fine and the multiyear suspension of its general partner and two other employees. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has posted a series of unflattering examinations of Sherb’s audit work going back almost a decade, regularly questioning whether the firm’s auditors conducted standard procedures like revenue verification. (It has since hired BDO USA Inc.)

When the shares of a typical company start to run up in price, there could be anything behind it, from a surprisingly good earnings report, to a bullish analyst call or even a well-regarded money manager proclaiming the value in a specific market sector.

When a penny stock is moving, it’s a certainty that someone, somewhere is saying or doing something to pump the share price.

While InterCloud’s never-ending flow of press releases proclaiming its new opportunities in a popular sector have certainly attracted buyers, the company’s use of promoters--a classic sign of a penny stock--has kept the company in the spotlight, after a fashion. For example, last week RedChip Companies released a report that put a $47.10 price target on InterCloud’s shares. Looking and reading every bit as crisply as a standard brokerage report, investors might assume that the industry and sales metrics cited for a likely 250% gain in share price were coming from someone who had independently weighted these arguments and made a bold call.

But that would be wrong: the Maitland Fla.-based RedChip is an investor relations firm whose strategy centers on putting out “research reports” written for, and approved by, its clients. In other words, they are press releases seeking to appeal to the marginally aware investor (RedChip’s work on behalf of its Chinese clients proved so damaging to investors that they dropped “coverage” of the sector in January 2013.)

For its work on InterCloud, the fine print at the bottom of the 14-page report discloses RedChip was paid 7,500 shares and is being paid a monthly cash fee for six months of investor relations work.

As the Observer reported, an odd footnote to InterCloud’s promotional gambit was the appearance of a pair of articles on the stock market commentary website Seeking Alpha that touted InterCloud’s prospects, posted in December and in January. Authored by John Mylant and a writer using the pseudonym “Kingmaker,” the pieces strongly advocated for InterCloud’s bright prospects because of the talent of its management and the fast growth of the cloud computing sector.

Not disclosed was the fact that the authors unflinching support for InterCloud was also a function of being paid to promote the shares. Last week, Rick Pearson, a West Coast-based investor, posted an article on Seeking Alpha describing how DreamTeamGroup, an investor relations firm ostensibly based in Indianapolis, solicited and paid writers to write enthusiastic, company reviewed and approved articles for release on Seeking Alpha, with the goal being to attract investors and drive up the share price.

According to Pearson, two of the more prolific DreamTeamGroup veiled touts were John Mylant and a man named Tom Meyer, a DreamTeamGroup employee who admitted to using the “Kingmaker” pseudonym.

(Mylant, who contacted the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation after this story was posted, said he has regularly posted articles and comments on Seeking Alpha and that the opinions he expresses were his own. He acknowledges being contacted by a "Tom"--Mylant did not recall his last name or company--who offered to pay him for articles written about companies he was already interested in. He said he is no longer working with "Tom.")

So a call to Lawrence Sands was in order.

Sands initially denied having heard of or used DreamTeamGroup but after being pressed on the matter said that he has “gotten maybe a few emails from them, stuff that got caught in the ‘spam’ filter.” He continued to argue that it was unlikely InterCloud used DreamTeamGroup for anything, however, since RedChip and a small New York firm, CSIR, were handling the company’s investor relations work. (CSIR founder Christine Petraglia said she had nothing to do with this issue, and said she provided InterCloud standard public- and investor relations services.)

Just before releasing this article, the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation found a clear link between DreamTeamGroup and InterCloud: a January 21 posting on DreamTeamGroup’s own blog that was cross-posted to a unit of DreamTeamGroup’s “Instablog” at Seeking Alpha.

A call to Lawrence Sands was not returned.

2 thoughts on “The Copper Archipelago: InterCloud

  1. Harry,

    Harry,

    As noted in an email to you,

    Re: Ben Wey’s research

    It is a complete and utter lie. Literally every single accusation he makes in his “research” is a fabrication.

    My father retired years back and now helps direct a soup kitchen. He and I have no professional dealings, he was never a source of mine for any article and at any rate, he did not trade securities based on long/short value concerns, but as a convertible arb, would use math-driven views of volatility.

    I do not have those bank accounts, represent no network and am a seemingly permanent member of the middle class.

    Please examine Wey’s work in the context of his promotions, regulatory problems, public statements about treatment of shareholders and his commitment to honest, fair dealing.

    Roddy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>